This illustrates the syntax we used. Our class specializers are enclosed in angle brackets. The VisualWorks Smalltalk compiler had a dormant, postfix, bracketed type recognition facility already built into it. We simply had to turn it on, and override a few methods to wire in our multimethod facilities. Any “easter egg” in the compiler, I think they call it…
	Asymmetric multimethods are preferentially attached or owned by their primary receiver classes. Symmetric multimethods are owned by none, or all, depending on how you want to look at it.
	As with the faux-Java example show, our is arguably an “asymmetric” design. Our goal was to present a symmetric syntax, as CLOS had done, while maintaining (at least for the time being) asymmetric implementations.
	(I’d like to have made it symmetric, but more compiler hacking would need to be done to carry this off.)